Misleading Website: big-bang-theory.com
Exposes “big-bang-theory.com” as a ID/Creationist website poising as a simple Science Web page. This is a response to a video using this website as an example of “Atheist” thought on the big bang.
Just used low-q video because I am getting tired of long up load times. Also I need to shave, have way too much neck fat, and look like … oh well.
—
Produced by Nathaniel Selby
Video Effects done in Windows Move Maker
3-D Effects in Blender
Video and Websites not produced by Nathaniel Selby were cited in the Video. Their presence in this video constitutes fair usage under title 17 of US code. Their use in this video is intended for educational purposes and not for profit. Their use in this video is not an indication of support of the views presented in this video
I am not responsible for the content of the following websites:
big-bang-theory.com
http://www.superstringtheory.com/cosmo/index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
This Video © Nathaniel David Selby, intended for posting on YouTube
Licenced under Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
Duration : 0:4:18
[youtube 2km8thntueo]
Its very …
Its very dis-heartening to have such con artists appealing to society under a cover of science, there is only one end result from this, the Stifling of human progress for half a century (at best), all because a few simpletons cant accept the fact that their pagan rip-off stories (which werent even supposed to be literal) arent literal.
Ironically, they hold us back from a level of progression that would appear (at face value at that time period) to be the result of intelligent design..
I remember seeing …
I remember seeing the ‘all about science’ website heading a few months back when researching the D-Helix DNA strand, I immediately realized it was a psuedo-scientific website that was..
1) Incredibly wrong most of the time
2) Spent most of its time harping on misconceptions and strawmen arguments
3) Trying to remove credibility from scientists, rather than attempting to refute the claims
4) A blatant bias towards creation and bias against everything non-creation